Skip to content

The Rational Thinker’s Manifesto

I have proposed a simple guide toward rational argumentation based on several principles of reason. I hope that it will be useful to you. 

If I seek to “win” an argument out of pride or out of the desire to “be right”, I harm the pursuit of the truth.

People who disagree with me are not automatically the enemy.

I have been wrong about things before. There is a possibility I am wrong about an issue. I will remember this fact with humility.

Though I have chosen a side, the fact that I have chosen it does not make it “good” and the counter argument and the people who believe it “evil.”

There are degrees of disagreement. I will not assume that someone who disagrees with me is automatically the polar opposite.

I value an environment where people are freely allowed to disagree in the realm of ideas. I reject the use of force by government or other powers to take away people’s right to disagree and have free thought. I will seek to convince others by reason, not by force.

I will not use ridicule or name-calling or other personal attacks in argument. These have no place in rational debate, and are a sign of anger and negative emotions, not reason.

People are more valuable than arguments. I will not seek to harm a person emotionally or otherwise in a debate.

I recognize that I have personal biases. I know that confirmation bias is a weakness in everyone. I will actively be on guard against these.

Actual arguments do not involve looking up a list of fallacies on the internet and throwing them at your opponent so you sound superior.

I will not assume that there are only two sides, two solutions, or only two valid perspectives. The universe is infinite and contains many possibilities.

I will actively resist the emotions of anger and hatred during any discussion. I will have steps planned out in advance that I will take in case of extreme emotions.

I choose to expose myself to different people and points of view that are not my own instead of being isolated in a social circle with those who are like myself.

I will not try to slightly change the topic of discussion to “win” an argument. I will not continually pepper my opponent with questions while failing to acknowledge any points she or he makes.

I will not dismiss any fact or information purely based on its source; this is not logical.

I will always remain aware that groups (even my own) have an agenda and continually are working to manipulate others to agree with them for less than altruistic purposes.

I will think, argue, and debate in search of the truth. The truth is just as valuable whether I discover it by winning or losing an argument.

I choose to acknowledge my opponent’s points, be open to persuasion, and carefully listen to him or her. I do this in hopes of understanding as well as expecting the same treatment in return.

If I start a conversation already assuming I’m right, I have done myself a disservice.

I will check my sources of information for accuracy.

Life is complex. In the vast majority of cases, no side is 100% right or 100% wrong. There is merit in nearly every perspective and I will seek to find it.

I will strive to avoid identity thinking or “groupthink.” I am an individual. Though I may belong or identify with a certain group, I am not under any obligation to always agree with that group or take that side. I am an independent thinker seeking the truth.

Some of my most deeply held beliefs about myself and the universe may, in fact, be incorrect. Though this may be hard to accept, I choose to be open to this possibility.

I will analyze my own position with the same level of scrutiny that I apply to my opponent’s.

I will always remember that the pursuit of truth and reason is my goal. I will set aside emotion and pride and seek to be as objective as possible in my quest to grow and learn.

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen Weese is an author, speaker, college instructor, and writer. 
Published inUncategorized